NOOOOOOOOO!!! I LOVED the first one. So pissed right now. I hope they find some way to release it, even if they have to go from an AO to an M rating.
i cant believe ratings from a non government regulated company matter this much, if I was game companies I would stick my game up esrb's ass and refuse to put their label on my games
Quote from: kite200 on June 21, 2007, 07:23:09 pm
non government regulated
That's the compromise. Stick it up their ass and you'll get government regulation.
then the companies can just sue for first ammendment rights. books arent rated. gimme a break
not that snk is that big a deal but snk made neo geo games until 2004 and didnt put esrb ratings on the box
Quote from: kite200 on June 21, 2007, 09:31:27 pm
first ammendment rights
First Amendment "free speech" rights on vgs could be abridged on through the commerce clause. Congress has the authority to restrict products -- I guess vg companies could give their stuff away for free, that would solve the issue.
see above, and most snk games featured blood and gore aka samurai showdown, though it was kinda censored in the us it could be accessed with a cheat code
I don't especially like this game in question, but a ban is a bit too much in my opinion.
There are lots and lots of very graphic and brutal movies out.
They should rate it properly so that only adults are allowed to play it and there should be no problem.
Adults should have the right to decide for themselves what they want to play and what not.
Maybe children should better not play this particular game.
I agree. The game is not for everyone. I'm not so much a fan of the gore as I was the interesting steath/hiding techniques that use shadows and stuff, and the plot itself was really cool. Although I have to say planning to release the game on Wii was a HUGE mistake. Their core audience are the XBOX/PS users.
I wouldn't say that. I think there are a lot of Wii owners who would buy the game, especially those hardcore guys starving for new games. On the other hand I'm sure it'll shift a lot of consoles when it comes out.
Anyways, the game would have gotten an AO rating on any console, so the problems are the same imo.
I dunno, I thought "funnydale" on Kotaku put it best:
QuoteI've said this months ago (and oddly enough, almost everyone on game sites disagreed with me); releasing Manhunt 2 on the Wii is completely counter-productive to the core Nintendo strategy that has so far, rocketed on the way to #1 this generation: Families, their children, and other non-gamers.
I guarantee you that if an "AO" version of Manhunt 2 was released on the Wii, Mom would think twice about letting their kids own a console that would potentially give kids the ability to slash someones throat with the Wiimote. And for those who say "Kids shouldn't be playing Manhunt 2 anyway, so what's the big deal?" Let me bring you to the real world: It doesn't matter if any kid could get access to such a game, the thought of such a game appearing on the Wii at all is far too risky to Nintendo's strategy of appealing to the group that has so far, brought Nintendo millions: Soccer Mom's, their kids, and non-gamers.
There is already a game where you can slash people's throats on the Wii.
Resident Evil 4. As far as I understand those people aren't even Zombies, so basically it's the same. ???
I understand the point though.
Moms can be very resolute.
I don't care anyways. Such games aren't my cup of tea.
It's just questionable why they rate far more brutal movies lower. :-\
Ultimately I guess, I just hate big corp. telling what I can and can't see. If I want to lay down money and play the game, I'm an adult and should be able to make that decision. I'm allowed to go see Hostel 2 or buy Hostel 1 without a problem, I should be able to play a violent video game. I'm worried about what this means for the future of mature-themed games as a whole though.
There wouldn't be a problem on the other hand if the console makers would allow AO rated games on their platforms.
no one cares that snk didnt put esrb ratings on the box? :(
ok, back on the main subject. why are books not regulated, aka battle royale.
Maybe because books are only words and no graphic display. ??? That's what I think.
With books you have at least to use your imagination if somebody's head is cut off.
Books have been banned by people and governments (coughconservativescough) throughout history. But I think since the First Amendment, even with some government lighting book on fire, we have a wholly ingrained mindset about books, similar to what manuel expresses. I think that since writing in general and books have been around so long, and they're seen as democratizing, books are accepted and allowed. But that doesn't stop people from trying to ban Harry Potter, Cuban books, etc., from libraries here. Sure books are for entertainment at times, but often are keeping free the marketplace of ideas, whereas vgs are almost always nothing more than entertainment, with the exception of the few that sell themselves as educational.